Homosexuality isn’t the same as Apartheid

UPDATED On Sunday 14 July 2019, the Dutch Reformed Church in Stellenberg appointed a minister who is in a same-sex relationship.

While many applaud this as a bold move towards the light, many of us are saddened by this deliberate move away from the clear teaching of the Bible. We are saddened by the attempted redefinition of sin and, therefore, the redefinition of repentance (turning from sin).

The Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa voted in 2015 to permit those in same-sex relationships to serve as ministers.  The synod also voted to permit same-sex unions to be blessed in Dutch Reformed churches. That decision was then appealed in 2016. 

On 8 March 2019 the appeal was upheld and the DRC reverted back to the 2015 pro-LGBTQ decision.

At present the DRC is experiencing huge turmoil as the issue of sexuality continues to be debated.1

Many of those who were pleased with the synod’s original  decision to permit same-sex marriage equate discrimination towards those who practice homosexuality as essentially the same as the discrimination towards black people under Apartheid.

For them, the 2015 synod’s decision was a great moment of liberation to be celebrated.2

However, homosexuality is not the new apartheid.

According to the Bible, differences in culture and ethnicity are part of God’s good creation and are to be celebrated – even as we are united in Christ.

Homosexual practice, on the other hand, (like all other sexual immorality) is not part of God’s good creation, but sinful and dishonouring to God.

Ministers and denominations that say otherwise are not being loving towards those who practice homosexuality because they are endangering their eternal well-being by giving the false assurance of a lifestyle  pleasing to God.

God’s Word must be our Rule

God is very much for sex, as shown by his creation of humans as sexual beings, with complimentary male and female anatomy.

God as Creator knows how best to enjoy his good gifts, including the gift of sex.

From the very beginning of the Bible we see that God’s purpose is for sex to take place within the marriage of one woman with one man (Genesis 2:24).

God creation purposes are evidenced in the biological differences between males and females.

Let the marriage bed be undefiled

The biblical institution of marriage is essential for the welfare of human society.

The Bible warns that there will also be those who will want to redefine marriage or devalue marriage.

“Let marriage be held in honour among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.”

Hebrews 14:3

Sexual immorality is any and all sexual activity outside biblically defined marriage.

Rather than celebrate sexual immorality – like many do – we should warn people that God’s judgement will come upon all the “sexually immoral and adulterous”.

Is homosexual practice sin?

To put it simply, yes.

Homosexual practice is not part of God’s good plan for human beings and is an expression  of our rebellion (many times subconscious) towards him.

In Romans 1:18-27, the Apostle Paul views homosexuality as the ultimate expression of a society’s rebellion towards God.

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,g] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

The practice of homosexuality turns God’s order of things upside down – much like the first sin in Genesis 3 when Adam and Eve listened to a creature not the Creator.

Some “biblical” scholars have sought to re-interpret the Bible to say that God is actually pro so-called homosexual marriage or partnership.

These are some of their arguments:

1. No longer applicable

Some will argue that the laws prohibiting homosexual behaviour are no longer applicable to us today as they were part of the discontinued parts of the Law of Moses (e.g. Leviticus 18:21-22, 20:13).

They argue that because we do not have to keep all the Law of Moses (e.g. not eat pork, shave our beards, and not wear cotton and wool at the same time) people should also be allowed to practice homosexuality.

This argument sounds convincing at first, but it cannot stand.

Firstly, heterosexual marriage is still God’s purpose as seen in the creation account – which comes before the Law of Moses.

Secondly, the New Testament also condemns homosexual practice.

Thirdly, the  laws forbidding homosexuality are further implications of the seventh commandment, “You shall not commit adultery” and are still very much applicable to us today. You might say that the laws against homosexuality are part of the “moral law”, not the “ceremonial law”.

REACH South Africa‘s position paper on homosexuality says:

“We note further that this defilement (e.g. Leviticus 18:21-22, 20:13) is no mere matter of ceremonial purity but something abhorrent to God, leading to the extreme penalty. We note further that these acts are not just condemned in Israel as God‘s holy people, but brought God‘s judgement even upon Gentile people. We know of no rescinding or lessening of the seriousness of what we can only accept as part of God’s moral law binding on all people in all cultures in all ages.”

2. No longer relevant

Others argue that the prohibitions in the Bible were culture bound and therefore no longer relevant in a modern world.

For instance, in the Old Testament homosexual behaviour was linked with idolatrous cult prostitution and what the biblical author was condemning was idolatry, not homosexuality.

Or they will argue that in the (intolerant, narrow-minded) New Testament author’s thinking, homosexual behaviour was considered taboo.

Today, however, we are not bigoted like they were and so we should embrace homosexuality as a healthy, alternative lifestyle.

Both these “culture-bound” arguments can be answered by the simple observation that the biblical authors were not airing their own opinions, but based their views on sexuality on God’s purpose for human beings from creation. (Cf. Romans 1:20, 25)

3. Misunderstanding of meaning

Lastly, others argue that what the Bible forbids is homosexual abuses, like rape (e.g. a male slave owner forcing himself on a male slave) and homosexual prostitution.

Hence, the Bible is not against loving, consensual homosexual relationships.

Again, this argument does not hold weight.

The homosexual act itself is prohibited in the Bible, not simply the motive, circumstances or context in which it takes place.

Is homosexuality genetic?

Yes and no.

Yes”, in that we are all born with a biased towards sin.

We are all natural-born sinners.

Some may have more of a tendency towards one particular sin than other sins.  Some may struggle more with gluttony than with greed.  Some may have a greater tendency towards pride than pornography; or a tendency towards homosexuality rather than heterosexual immorality (e.g. co-habitation, adultery etc).

No”, in that there is no homosexual gene that somehow fatalistically determines ones sexual orientation.

Your upbringing, circumstances, childhood and rearing (positive and negative) plays a huge role in determining your strengths, weaknesses and temptation areas.

However, at the end of the day, we are all – each one – responsible and accountable for our choices.

Is there hope for those who practice homosexuality?


In one sense homosexuality is the ultimate expression of rebellion towards God’s order; but in another sense, the Bible treats homosexuality as it does any other sin.

Consider 1 Corinthians 6:9-11,

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. 

Sin needs to be repented of.

God forgives us our sins on the grounds of Christ’s death for us.

As Christians we still sin, but our lives are marked by hatred of and turning from sin.

A Christian’s life can never be characterized by ongoing, habitual sin – whatever that sin may be.

“If we say we have fellowship with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth.”

1 John 1:6

Homosexual orientation vs. homosexual practice

You may struggle with homosexual feelings, but because you are a Christian and want to honour God, you do not act on those feelings.  You are to be commended!

The Bible does not condemn homosexual orientation, but homosexual practice.

To put it more generally: temptation is not a sin, acting on temptation is.

Jesus was tempted and yet did not sin.

I may be tempted to view pornography or commit adultery, but only when I act on those temptations does it become sin.

Is God homophobic?

God is definitely not homophobic, but he is holy.

He is sin-phobic.  God hates sin – all sin.

He hates homosexual sin as much as he hates heterosexual sin or pride.

The astounding news of the gospel is that Jesus came to save sinners.

Jesus did not come to save those who love their sin or try to justify their sin, but those who recognize they are sinners.

If church leaders keep telling sinners they are not sinners, how terrible will it be for those leaders on the Day of Judgement?

Jesus said it would be better for them to have a great millstone tied around their necks and be thrown into the sea (Mark 9:42).

An extract from REACH South Africa‘s position paper on homosexuality says:

“It is beholden on every true Christian to follow the plain teaching of the Word of God, and therefore to avoid homosexual activity as sin on a par with stealing, murder, and covetousness, which displeases God and makes us liable to the judgement of God.

It is beholden on every Christian, and especially ministers and teachers, to warn the unwary that such behaviour is offensive to God and bound to bring punishment.

As believers in the Christian gospel it is every Christian‘s privilege to assure those who turn to Christ from whatever sinful path into which they may have strayed that they have God‘s complete forgiveness and that they are wholly cleansed and brought into fellowship with him, and are true members of his Church.

Christian churches, denominations, and ministers are recognized by their profession of Christ as Lord and their adherence to the Word of God. Churches, denominations and ministers which advocate lifestyles in open conflict with Holy Scripture have strayed from the historic Christian Faith.

In particular, churches, denominations and ministers which by teaching, example and ordination policy declare to the world that homosexual activity is pleasing to God, when God‘s Word declares it evil and sufficient to exclude people from God‘s kingdom, endanger people‘s souls, and should be avoided by Christian people.”

The Dutch Reformed Church’s previous support of Apartheid (which they have repented of) can in no stretch of the imagination be used to question their support of the traditional (and Biblical) view of marriage and sexuality.

May God give us all the courage to keep speaking the truth in great love.

May God help us to keep calling sin, sin.

May God help us to keep pointing people to Jesus, the one who died to save and restore sinners.3

  1. Pray for those in the DRC who seek to stand firm for the biblical view on sexuality in the midst of great opposition.
  2. For a fairly typical view from the DRC on why we should “re-interpret” the Bible on sexual issues, click here.
  3. Here is an awesome testimony of God’s grace in the area of sexuality.

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive awesome content in your inbox, every time we post!

We don’t spam!