Why Archbishop Tutu is wrong about homosexuality

Archbishop TutuArchbishop Tutu recently said that God is for homosexual marriage and would fight for gay rights as much as he fought for an end to apartheid. While I agree with him that all-violence against homosexuals is absolutely wrong and irreconcilable with Christianity, I would differ with him on God’s view on “gay rights” and homosexual marriage.

This is not an anti-sex post. God is very much for sex as evidenced by his creation of us as sexual beings that enjoy sex. God as our Creator also knows how best we can enjoy his good gifts, including the gift of sex. From the very beginning of the Bible we see God’s purpose for sexual unity to take place within the marriage of one woman with one man (Genesis 2:24). God creation purposes are evidenced in the biological differences between men and women.

Let the marriage bed be undefiled

The biblical institution of marriage is essential for the welfare of human society. The Bible in fact warns that there will also be those who will want to redefine marriage or devalue marriage. Hebrews 14:3 says,

“Let marriage be held in honour among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.”

Sexual immorality is any and all sexual activity outside (or before) biblically defined marriage. Rather than celebrate sexual immorality – like the world and Archbishop Tutu does – we should warn people that God’s judgement will come upon all the “sexually immoral and adulterous”.

Is homosexuality sin?

To put it simply, yes. Homosexuality is not part of God’s good plan for human beings and is an expression of our rebellion towards him.  In Romans 1:18-27 the Apostle Paul views homosexuality as the ultimate expression of rebellion towards God. The practise of homosexuality turns God’s order of things on its head, much like the first sin in Genesis 3 when Adam and Eve listened to creation not the Creator. Some “biblical” scholars have sought to re-interpret the Bible to say that God is actually pro gay marriage.  These are some of their arguments:

1. No longer applicable

Some will argue that the laws prohibiting homosexual behaviour are no longer applicable to us today as they were part of the discontinued parts of the Law of Moses (e.g. Leviticus 18:21-22, 20:13). The argument says that because we do not have to keep all the Law of Moses (e.g. not eat pork, shave our beards, and not wear cotton and wool at the same time) we should also be allowed to practise homosexuality. This argument sounds convincing at first, but cannot stand. Firstly, heterosexual marriage is still God’s purpose as seen in the creation account – which comes before the Law. Secondly, the New Testament also condemns homosexual practise. And thirdly, I would argue, the above laws forbidding homosexuality are further implications of the seventh commandment, “You shall not commit adultery” and still very much applicable to us today. You may say the commands are part of the “moral law”.

REACH South Africa‘s position paper on homosexuality says:

“We note further that this defilement (e.g. Leviticus 18:21-22, 20:13) is no mere matter of ceremonial purity but something abhorrent to God, leading to the extreme penalty. We note further that these acts are not just condemned in Israel as God‘s holy people, but brought God‘s judgement even upon Gentile people. We know of no rescinding or lessening of the seriousness of what we can only accept as part of God‘s moral law binding on all people in all cultures in all ages.”

2. No longer relevant

Others argue that the prohibitions in the Bible were culture bound and therefore no longer relevant. For instance, in the Old Testament homosexual behaviour was linked with idolatrous cult prostitution and what the biblical author was condemning was idolatry not homosexuality. Or they will argue that in the (intolerant, narrow-minded) New Testament author’s thinking homosexual behaviour was considered taboo; but today we are not that bigoted and so we should embrace this healthy, alternative lifestyle.

Both “culture-bound” arguments can be answered by the simple observation that biblical authors were not promoting their own opinions, but linking their views on sexuality to God’s purpose for human beings at creation. (Cf. Romans 1:20, 25)

3. Misunderstanding of meaning

Lastly, others argue that what the Bible forbids is homosexual rape, homosexual prostitution or homosexual unconsensual intercourse e.g. a male slave owner forcing himself on a male slave. Hence the Bible is not against loving, consensual homosexual relationships. Again, this argument does not hold weight. The homosexual act itself is prohibited in the Bible, not simply the motive, circumstance or context in which it takes place.

Is homosexuality genetic?

Yes and no. “Yes”, in that we are all born with a biased towards sin. We are all natural born sinners. Some may have more of a tendency towards one particular sin than other sins. One may struggle more with gluttony than with greed. One may have a greater tendency towards pride than pornography; or a tendency towards homosexuality rather than heterosexual sexual immorality (e.g. co-habitation, adultery etc). “No”, in that there is no homosexual gene that somehow fatalistically determines your sexual orientation. One’s upbringing, circumstances, childhood and rearing (positive and negative) plays a huge role in determining one’s strengths, weaknesses, and temptation areas. But at the end of the day, we are – each one – responsible and accountable for our own choices.

Is there hope for practising homosexuals?

Yes. In one sense homosexuality is the ultimate expression of rebellion towards God, but in another sense the Bible treats homosexuality as it does any other sin. Consider 1 Corinthians 6:

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. (v9-11)

Sin needs to be repented of. God forgives us our sins through the death of Christ for us. As Christians we still sin, but our lives are marked by hatred of and turning from sin. A Christian’s life cannot be characterised by ongoing, habitual sin – whatever that sin may be. 1 John 1:6 says,

“If we say we have fellowship with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth.”

Homosexual orientation vs. homosexual behaviour

You may struggle with homosexual feelings, but because you are a Christian and want to honour God, you do not act on those feelings. You are to be commended. Homosexual orientation is not a sin, bit the homosexual act is. To put it more generally: temptation is not a sin, acting on temptation is. Jesus was tempted yet did not sin. I may be tempted to view pornography but only when I act on the temptation does it become a sin.

Is God homophobic?

In this I agree with the Archbishop. God is not homophobic, but he is holy. He hates sin – all sin. He hates homosexual sin as much as he hates pride. The awesome news of the gospel is that Jesus came to save sinners. Jesus did not come to save those who love their sin or try to justify their sin, but those who recognise they are sinners. If some church leaders keep telling sinners they are not sinners, how terrible will it be for those leaders on the Day of Judgement? Jesus said it would be better for them to have a great millstone tied around their necks and be thrown into the sea. (Mark 9:42)

REACH South Africa‘s position paper on homosexuality says:

“It is beholden on every true Christian to follow the plain teaching of the Word of God, and therefore to avoid homosexual activity as sin on a par with stealing, murder, and covetousness, which displeases God and makes us liable to the judgement of God.

It is beholden on every Christian, and especially ministers and teachers, to warn the unwary that such behaviour is offensive to God and bound to bring punishment.

As believers in the Christian gospel it is every Christian‘s privilege to assure those who turn to Christ from whatever sinful path into which they may have strayed that they have God‘s complete forgiveness and that they are wholly cleansed and brought into fellowship with him, and are true members of his Church.

Christian churches, denominations, and ministers are recognized by their profession of Christ as Lord and their adherence to the Word of God. Churches, denominations and ministers which advocate lifestyles in open conflict with Holy Scripture have strayed from the historic Christian Faith. In particular, churches, denominations and ministers which by teaching, example and ordination policy declare to the world that homosexual activity is pleasing to God, when God‘s Word declares it evil and sufficient to exclude people from God‘s kingdom, endanger people‘s souls, and should be avoided by Christian people.”

 

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive awesome content in your inbox, every time we post!

We don’t spam!

5 comments

  1. Dear Barbara

    I agree with your sentiments that paedophilic behaviour by priests is immoral, wicked and unacceptable, and will indeed incur God’s judgement.

    However, the Bible views all sexual activity outside of marriage as immoral and sinful. Marriage in God’s view is the ongoing, committed, faithful relationship between one woman and one man. Therefore homosexual sex is immoral, just as is adultery, co-habiting and pre-marital sex. God’s good intention for humans is consensual sex in marriage.

    As a Christian I do not claim to be sinless, but where there is sin in my life I don’t revel in that sin but seek to turn from it and live in a way that honours God. I seek to sin less.

    We will each one be held accountable before God for our own actions, sinful or otherwise. One person’s sin cannot excuse or defend another’s.

    Practising homosexuals should turn for their immorality and sinful lifestyles and seeks God’s forgiveness in Christ. The same applies to practising adulterers, co-habiters, drunkards and idolaters etc. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)

    In this post I have simply sought to accurately reflect the teachings of the Bible and the Christian consensus over the last 2000 years. These are not my own opinions.

    May I suggest that the question you should ask yourself is: Do I view the Bible as authoritative? Yes, the Bible was written by a variety of men over hundreds of years, but it has one common theme, one common message, and one Ultimate Author (2 Timothy 3:16-17, 2 Peter 1:21). The Bible’s central message is that rebellious and sinful people (applies to all!) can be restored to a holy God through Jesus.

    The Bible is God’s Word and therefore should influence and determine how we view all life’s issues.

    I hope this helps to clarify my post.
    Andre

  2. okay so im a bit confused, where in this passage does it mention the sex of persons Hebrews 14:3 says, “Let marriage be held in honour among all, and
    let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually
    immoral and adulterous.” Are u stating that Gay and lesbian people are un honouralbe? Are U stating that gay and Lesbian people are immoral and adulterous. ARE U STATING THAT ALL MARRIAGES BETWEEN SAME SEX COUPLES ARE IMMORAL And why are u commiting a sin and Judging people. i FEEL WHAT IS IMMORAL IS MALE PRIESTS BEING PEDEOPHILES AND HARDLY EVER BEEN TRIED BY THE LAW NOT THE CHURCH. Please let me know in which book of the bible i can read where it’s ok for pedeophile Priests to be immoral.
    Can u cast the first stone???? Is it not just some peoples beliefs that Gays and Lesbians are taboo to God. Please u are using heresay in your whole artical, very judgemental and offensive, and im not Gay or a lesbian. But then again this is just my opinion and interpretation, as is your above article. Who wrote the bible? Was it not a man with opinions of his own on how humans should behave as christians?
    @ Andy, as a christian you judge a Bishop. Are you without sin? or just too ashamed and hide behind being a christian. Would you dare place your skeletons in your cuboard, on here, to be judged and commented on. Cant wait to read thoes.

    Very narrow minded indeed.
    For every action there is a reaction, by judging and making the statements you do, are you not sinning. Do you believe Gays and Lesbians are not humans. DID Christ not die so we could live and sin as God knew we would. Don’t forget God had already cleansed the earth of man once with a great flood. God knew we were sinners yet he sent his only son knowing we humans would slaghter him. How will God judge you??????

  3. Wonderful simply put article which I pray wil help those struggling with this particular sin to understand Gods grace, but also for those like Archbishop Tutu and others who feel that their opinions are superior to Almighty God’s to repent and start declaring. “Thus saith the Lord”, not thus saith the arch.

  4. Thanks Andre, great article. Unfortunately Bishop Tutu has gone too far, as he has even said that he would rather go to Hell than a “homophobic Heaven”. He has said some crazy things before, like “God is not a Christian” in 2006. If you believe that ALL of Scripture is inspired by God and is His Word, then you must know that NO practicing “Gays” will be in heaven, only those who have turned from their sin and trusted Jesus alone for salvation, leaving their old lifestyles.Christians need to be aware of the gay agenda, and not become used to the constant propaganda to accept the sin as “okay”. Stand firm in the faith!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *